<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Google destroyed $1 billion of United Airlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetbusiness.co.uk/13092008/how-google-destroyed-1-billion-of-united-airlines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetbusiness.co.uk/13092008/how-google-destroyed-1-billion-of-united-airlines/</link>
	<description>Business and Internet news from the UK</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 18:37:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.internetbusiness.co.uk/13092008/how-google-destroyed-1-billion-of-united-airlines/comment-page-1/#comment-79982</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetbusiness.co.uk/?p=1846#comment-79982</guid>
		<description>What a joke to place the blame on a bot! I can imagine the potential for a local rag in south florida not catching this, but Bloomberg - you would think that they would at least do a quick background check and or at least have a modicum of an idea of this major publicly traded company financial state. An embarrassing mistake by this billion dollar news agency that knocks its credibility in the markets!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a joke to place the blame on a bot! I can imagine the potential for a local rag in south florida not catching this, but Bloomberg &#8211; you would think that they would at least do a quick background check and or at least have a modicum of an idea of this major publicly traded company financial state. An embarrassing mistake by this billion dollar news agency that knocks its credibility in the markets!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.internetbusiness.co.uk/13092008/how-google-destroyed-1-billion-of-united-airlines/comment-page-1/#comment-74987</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetbusiness.co.uk/?p=1846#comment-74987</guid>
		<description>I agree - I really can&#039;t take seriously attempts to blame Google on this one. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; I really can&#8217;t take seriously attempts to blame Google on this one. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy</title>
		<link>http://www.internetbusiness.co.uk/13092008/how-google-destroyed-1-billion-of-united-airlines/comment-page-1/#comment-74929</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetbusiness.co.uk/?p=1846#comment-74929</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but most of the analysis I&#039;m seeing all over the internet doesn&#039;t make any sense to me.

Google has a piece of software.  Everyone knows how it works, and that it sometimes gets things wrong.

Tribune has a piece of software too.  My guess is that it was designed prior to Google News.  It may be annoying, but they&#039;re under no obligation to cater what they do to Google&#039;s software.  Additionally, in any event Tribune isn&#039;t responsible for anything Google does with their information.

The humans here were at this finance newsletter company and especially at Bloomberg.  No one&#039;s saying they sold the stock because of a story in the Florida Sun-Sentinel.  They&#039;re saying they sold because the story was in Bloomberg, who they trust to verify information prior to publishing it.

Why is the spotlight not on Bloomberg here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but most of the analysis I&#8217;m seeing all over the internet doesn&#8217;t make any sense to me.</p>
<p>Google has a piece of software.  Everyone knows how it works, and that it sometimes gets things wrong.</p>
<p>Tribune has a piece of software too.  My guess is that it was designed prior to Google News.  It may be annoying, but they&#8217;re under no obligation to cater what they do to Google&#8217;s software.  Additionally, in any event Tribune isn&#8217;t responsible for anything Google does with their information.</p>
<p>The humans here were at this finance newsletter company and especially at Bloomberg.  No one&#8217;s saying they sold the stock because of a story in the Florida Sun-Sentinel.  They&#8217;re saying they sold because the story was in Bloomberg, who they trust to verify information prior to publishing it.</p>
<p>Why is the spotlight not on Bloomberg here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
